The Echo by James Smythe

Artwork by Liu Zishan from 123RF.com; quote from Babylon’s Ashes by James S A Corey; banner courtesy of imyril of onemore.org

 

Twenty-three years after the events described in The Explorer, twin brothers Tomas and Mirakel Hyvönen head up an international mission to investigate the anomaly that can be seen in the region of space in which the Ishiguro disappeared. They have dedicated their lives to this anomaly and this mission is to be the fruition of all their dreams. They have meticulously planned every detail, have spared no expense to create the perfect research vessel and put together the best team. Mira will be aboard the Lära (named for the twins’ dead mother) along with five other scientists and engineers, while Tomas will monitor and control the mission from Earth.

Needless to say, nothing quite goes to plan.

18664985

The sh*t doesn’t hit the fan quite as fast as it did in The Explorer (in which everyone was dead by page 63, and that’s not even a spoiler), but when it does, it hits hard. The title of this second volume (of a planned four) is apt. The events aboard the Lära echo those of the Ishiguro and Smythe focuses his attention on Mira’s psychological collapse just as he did on Cormac’s in the previous book.

Mira is no more likeable than Cormac was for me, and yet I found him a more sympathetic character. His relationship with his twin brother looms large in the story: twins who have worked together in the same field and share the same passion for the anomaly; twins who have always been in competition with one another, who are perhaps not as similar as first appears. As Mira comes face to face with the anomaly, as crew members die and science fails to explain any of the things happening around him, his resentment and frustration with his brother becomes more apparent. As the less socially adept brother, Mira has often taken the back seat, seemingly protected by Tomas. Doubt and suspicion later suggest that Tomas has deliberately side-lined his twin. Even his prized place aboard the Lära, won from Tomas in a game, later appears to have been the result of manipulation.

The push and pull of this relationship, central to Mira’s life, adds a low-level tension that reverberates throughout The Echo. We never ‘meet’ Tomas in person, he is only ever a disembodied voice over the comm, sometimes guiding, sometimes snipping at Mira. But with everything from Mira’s point of view, the reader can never be sure how far his portrait of his brother can be trusted. The bundle of love and resentment that he feels for his older-by-minutes brother, colours everything. And there is no answer to this, just as there is no answer to the anomaly.

All that is clear about the anomaly so far is that it plays with time. The way in which it does so in this book is different to the way in which it did in The Explorer, and understandable rules have yet to be determined. I have a sneaking suspicion that explaining the anomaly is not the author’s intention. Instead, I think that this quartet is going to be all about how we react to the unknowable. As we push out into the solar system and beyond, and encounter things we cannot comprehend, how will we deal? Are we robust enough to face things so far beyond our ken?

Mira is at pains to show how rigorously scientific this mission will be in comparison with the media-friendly Ishiguro’s excursion. He stresses again and again how fit for purpose the ship is, how talented the crew, how detailed the plan. The aim is to gather readings, measurements, information, with which to resolve the mystery. And yet for all the knowledge gained (presumably – see note below) there is no increase in understanding. Perhaps we lack some vital clue or imaginative leap. Or perhaps we have reached the limit of our species’ ability to parse what we experience.

(Note: a small snipe here – they never actually seem to take any measurements, or to try and determine the density of the anomaly and what it might be made of (although they do try to take a clumsy sample), or any other science-y thing that I’d expect of Scientists encountering a New Thing. But I am not wise in the ways of science and there could be a perfectly reasonable explanation. This annoyed me though, and I want it noted).

This was as chilly a read as its predecessor and not any kind of advert for space travel. Smythe’s writing is deceptively clean and cold – it’s like reading mouthwash – so that you don’t quite realise he’s gotten under your skin until it’s too late (for me, Inna’s cycle outside the ship will remain the most disturbing image, not just because of what she suffers, but because of the reactions of those who remain inside). Still, I find myself anticipating the next instalment of the Anomaly Quartet, and the questions it will raise. Whether there are answers or not.

“But we – Tomas, myself, all of us, really – are scientists. We are here to discover. If you do not discover, you are nothing.”

 

8 thoughts on “The Echo by James Smythe

  1. Do you have a link to the first book? You’ve obviously read it and I’m 100% certain I liked/commented on it, but would like to check.

    And after reading your snipe, I just have this to say:
    HOW DARE YOU QUESTION THE SCYENZETISTS?
    they know what they are doing. So sit down, shut up, and obey.
    😉

    It is good to know that this is quartet so there is an end game. Once it’s all out, and you’re still raving about it, I might have to add it to the tbr. Not a big fan of unlikeable characters though.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Drat! I meant to link to my post for the first book! Sorry! Here it is: https://bookforager.wordpress.com/2017/09/09/the-explorer-by-james-smythe/

      As for the scyenzetists… *shakes fist in their general direction* 🤣

      Have to agree with you on unlikeable characters, they often spoils things. In the first book, The Explorer, I hated all of them. In this one I liked one of them and tolerated the others. Maybe in book three there’ll be someone who’s ok, and in book four someone who is awesome. I live in hope! 😃

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thanks for the link. I was mousing over all the titles in your post, as some themes on wp don’t do a good job of showing where a link is (or my eyes can’t tell the difference in text color a lot of the time).

        Hope springs eternal! 😀

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Ha, so far it seems we had very similar reactions to the first two books. They’re books I didn’t exactly enjoy, but that got under my skin. And I agree – they’re far less interested in space science than in psychology (if you want a harder SF read that delivers both, try Blindsight by Peter Watts). I find them compelling – I think it’s partly my innate assumption conditioned by all those heroic Hollywood movies that there WILL be a way out of the predicaments – and 3 books in, I’m still not sure how. I look forward to your take on book 3!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Ooo, thanks for the recommendation of Blindsight – have added to my list. 🙂
      It took me a while to appreciate the psychological element, but, like you, I’m compelled to read these books. I need to know how it will end (although I’m a little less hopeful that there will be a way out – being a natural pessimist!) 😀
      Am very keen to get on with The Edge because, if I remember right from your review, it has a more likeable protagonist?

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s